Top postatori
GUMUS-NOOR (35933) | ||||
florina-octaviana89 (4248) | ||||
utzy (4150) | ||||
IrinaLove (2650) | ||||
Gumus (2280) | ||||
Nety (1724) | ||||
denta (1194) | ||||
turkiss_woman (1036) | ||||
cristinuta (1022) | ||||
GIULIA (773) |
Subiecte similare
Ultimele subiecte
Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
5 participanți
Pagina 30 din 32
Pagina 30 din 32 • 1 ... 16 ... 29, 30, 31, 32
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
Ultima editare efectuata de catre florina-octaviana89 in Sam Mar 12, 2011 4:11 pm, editata de 1 ori
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
http://koreafilm.ro/blog/category/recenzii-koreafilm/
Jumong: intre dragoste si resentiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXNgPWq9qG4&feature=player_embedded
Jumong: intre dragoste si resentiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXNgPWq9qG4&feature=player_embedded
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
Da ,citisem recenzia de pe blog KoreaFilm,dar acum am recitit-o,pt .ca intradevar autoarea recenziei a surprins f.bine acest sentiment,al dragostei si resemnarii.
Mi-a placut mult paralela pe care o face intre cele doua mame,regina si mama lui Jumong si modul cum au inteles sa-si educe copii.Dar cu toate astea nu putem trece cu vederea ca pe tot parcursul serialului si personajul Jumong a avut momente cind s-a resemnat,chiar daca idealul lui de a intemeia o noua natiune a fost atins.
Mi-a placut mult paralela pe care o face intre cele doua mame,regina si mama lui Jumong si modul cum au inteles sa-si educe copii.Dar cu toate astea nu putem trece cu vederea ca pe tot parcursul serialului si personajul Jumong a avut momente cind s-a resemnat,chiar daca idealul lui de a intemeia o noua natiune a fost atins.
mioaranita60- Fan
- Mesaje : 466
Data de inscriere : 29/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
Daeso - adevărul istoric
Daeso (대소왕,带素王) (7 î.Hr.-22 d.Hr.) a fost un rege al celui de-al treilea regat antic coreean Buyeo .
Daeso a fost primul fiu al regelui Geumwa şi nepotul fondatorului Buyeo ( primul domnitor, Hae Buru) .
Daeso era primul prinţ al Buyeo, dar după ce a fost întrecut la tir cu arcul de către Jumong, a început rivalitatea dintre cei doi.
În anul 37 î.Hr., Jumong a înfiinţat Goguryeo, iar când regele Geumwa a murit , în anul 7 î.Hr., Daeso a devenit rege al Buyeo.
Daeso a adunat destulă putere militară pentru a ataca Goguryeo. Înainte de a ataca, a trimis un emisar în Goguryeo, unde de-acum domnea fiul lui Jumong, regele Yuri, cerându-i să trimită un ostatic regal la Buyeo. Goguryeo a respins cererea şi aastfel a început primul război Goguryeo-Buyeo, în 6 DC. Daeso a condus o armată de 50 000 de oameni spre Goguryeo, dar a fost forţat să se retragă, blocat de o zăpadă abundentă.
Apoi Daeso a trebuit să aştepte timp de şapte ani, pentru a recâştiga ceea ce a pierdut în primul război cu Goguryeo. Apoi, în anul 13 d.Hr., Daeso a pornit să cucerească Goguryeo încă o dată. De data aceasta, Muhyul , prinţ al Goguryeo şi nepot al lui Jumong, a condus armatele din Goguryeo într-o ambuscadă bine planificată şi a decimat armata lui Daeso. Numai el şi câţiva dintre oamenii lui au scăpat cu viaţă. După aceste două eşecuri, economia din Buyeo a decăzut şi haosul a fost inevitabil.
După moartea regelui Yuri, prinţul Muhyul a ajuns pe tron şi a devenit regele Daemusin .
Regele Daemusin a invadat Buyeo , l-a ucis în cele din urmă pe Daeso, dar nu a distrus regatul (în anul 21 d.Hr.).
După moartea lui Daeso, al treilea fiu al regelui Geumwa a devenit rege al Buyeo.
http://cinefill.blogspot.com/2011/03/daeso-adevarul-istoric.html
Daeso (대소왕,带素王) (7 î.Hr.-22 d.Hr.) a fost un rege al celui de-al treilea regat antic coreean Buyeo .
Daeso a fost primul fiu al regelui Geumwa şi nepotul fondatorului Buyeo ( primul domnitor, Hae Buru) .
Daeso era primul prinţ al Buyeo, dar după ce a fost întrecut la tir cu arcul de către Jumong, a început rivalitatea dintre cei doi.
În anul 37 î.Hr., Jumong a înfiinţat Goguryeo, iar când regele Geumwa a murit , în anul 7 î.Hr., Daeso a devenit rege al Buyeo.
Daeso a adunat destulă putere militară pentru a ataca Goguryeo. Înainte de a ataca, a trimis un emisar în Goguryeo, unde de-acum domnea fiul lui Jumong, regele Yuri, cerându-i să trimită un ostatic regal la Buyeo. Goguryeo a respins cererea şi aastfel a început primul război Goguryeo-Buyeo, în 6 DC. Daeso a condus o armată de 50 000 de oameni spre Goguryeo, dar a fost forţat să se retragă, blocat de o zăpadă abundentă.
Apoi Daeso a trebuit să aştepte timp de şapte ani, pentru a recâştiga ceea ce a pierdut în primul război cu Goguryeo. Apoi, în anul 13 d.Hr., Daeso a pornit să cucerească Goguryeo încă o dată. De data aceasta, Muhyul , prinţ al Goguryeo şi nepot al lui Jumong, a condus armatele din Goguryeo într-o ambuscadă bine planificată şi a decimat armata lui Daeso. Numai el şi câţiva dintre oamenii lui au scăpat cu viaţă. După aceste două eşecuri, economia din Buyeo a decăzut şi haosul a fost inevitabil.
După moartea regelui Yuri, prinţul Muhyul a ajuns pe tron şi a devenit regele Daemusin .
Regele Daemusin a invadat Buyeo , l-a ucis în cele din urmă pe Daeso, dar nu a distrus regatul (în anul 21 d.Hr.).
După moartea lui Daeso, al treilea fiu al regelui Geumwa a devenit rege al Buyeo.
http://cinefill.blogspot.com/2011/03/daeso-adevarul-istoric.html
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
GOGURYEO
Competing Nationalisms:
The mobilisation of history and archaeology in the Korea-China wars over Koguryo/Gaogouli
By Yonson Ahn, The Japan Focus
Abstract: This article explores how and why history and archaeology have been mobilised and utilised in nationalist projects in East Asia, especially in the case of the Koguryo dispute between Korea and China. Koguryo (Korean)/Gaogouli (Chinese), an ancient kingdom in the period between 37 BC and AD 668, encompassed a vast area from central Manchuria to south of Seoul. According to the "Northeast Project”, launched in China in 2002, Gaogouli was an ethnic regime in an ancient Chinese province. In contrast, Korean historians of nationalist persuasion view Koguryo as an ancestral state of the Korean historical tradition and a foundation of the national identity. Unity, continuity and coherence are claimed in both communities through invoking the history and culture of Koguryo/Gaogouli. Koguryo/Gaogouli relics which were put on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2004 are pivotal in the contestation between China and Korea. In both, the ancient relics are held to show the distinctiveness of a national past linked to the present. This article argues that the contested history of Koguryo/Gaogouli should be examined as a site of historical hybridity between China and Korea, rather than being claimed as a site of exclusive national history.
...For Koreans, the northern lands of Puyo (Korean)/Fuyu (Chinese), Koguryo and Parhae have been thought of as a spiritual motherland nourishing Korean culture (Byington 2004-c). Amongst the ancient kingdoms, Koguryo has always been treated as an ancestral state within the Korean historical tradition which both nurtures and unites people under one national identity, a feeling that has been particularly strong in North Korea. Thus, across the political spectrum in academia and NGOs, South Koreans have been unanimous in criticizing China’s claim to Koguryo’s historical heritage. This has been true in North Korea, as well. A shared Korean nationalism has facilitated North-South cooperation on the issue. Choe Kwang-sik (2004-b), a leading South Korean historian and protester in the Koguryo affair, points that the Chinese remapping of history could result in reducing the span of Korean history to less than 2,000 years, thereby losing 700 years of a proud chapter of its history, losing a historical pillar of Korean identity, delimiting the size of Korea's territory to an area south of the Han River. A trans-historical "we” with timeless qualities is constructed in nationalist narratives. Yoe Ho-kyu (2004), another South Korean historian, asserts that "it is absolutely clear that the Goguryeo people are ancestors of the Korean people because Korea inherited Goguryeo culture in its entirety.” Koguryo history is thus mobilised to buttress the continuity of the Korean nation-state since the foundation of the nation by Tan’gun, roughly five millennia ago, through to the modern nation-state. The historically recovered ancient past has been powerful in defining contemporary Korean national identity. Thus, the Koguryo issue has led to an escalation in the debate over sites of "ethnic origins” and national continuity in Korea. The concerns over "damaging the origin of the Korean nation fatally” so that Korea becomes "a rootless nation” have been expressed in the media. This maintains the trope that "Our roots define us.”
Protests against claims to the Chineseness of Koguryo have been intense. In December 2003, activist groups in South Korea and overseas launched a public awareness campaign. South Korean civic activists held a series of rallies in protest against the Northeast Project and the Chinese government. The issue has become a frequent topic on TV and radio. A group of seventeen historical societies across South Korea took joint action against their Chinese counterparts in December 2003. The Society for Korean Ancient History issued a statement condemning China’s actions. Rallies have been held outside the Chinese embassy in Seoul. Scores of websites dedicated to the study of Koguryo have sprung up. Korean "netizens” protest and lay emphasis on "Korean spirit” by posting, for example, statements such as this: "as a small country, we have suffered countless hardships and humiliation at the hands of stronger nations, but the spirit of Korea can never be extinguished.” "The Spirit of Koguryo is in the hearts of 80 million Koreans,” reads a wide banner hung in Seoul during a demonstration in January 2004. It was referring to the populations of both North and South, as well as to Koreans living abroad. The Chinese claims to Koguryo have resulted in promoting cooperation between North and South Koreans and the Korean diaspora. The nation is inscribed as one surrounded by others who "steal” "our history and territory”. Collective needs to preserve the community’s irreplaceable historical values have been strongly addressed in the face of China’s nationalist projects.
Indeed, the two Koreas have competed to establish hegemony and legitimacy as heirs of the Korean nation since the partition in the postwar era. Koguryo antiquities and history embody special political significance in this competition. They denote the legitimacy of political authority and rule in North Korea. Koguryo is eulogised as an embodiment of the true national spirit and depicted as a champion of Koreanness against treacherous pro-foreign Silla in the North Korean official version of history ( Petrov 2004). Some North Korean archaeologists deny that "the Han Chinese ever conquered any part of the Korean peninsula.” (Pearson 1978, in Nelson 1995: 229) North Korean historians underline the "self-reliance, uniqueness and superiority of Goguryeo culture”. (Chin Ho-t’ae 1990) Accordingly, Chinese claims on Koguryo have been strongly denounced as "a pathetic attempt to manipulate history for its own interests” or "intentionally distorting historical facts through biased perspectives” in North Korean media...
Competing Nationalisms:
The mobilisation of history and archaeology in the Korea-China wars over Koguryo/Gaogouli
By Yonson Ahn, The Japan Focus
Abstract: This article explores how and why history and archaeology have been mobilised and utilised in nationalist projects in East Asia, especially in the case of the Koguryo dispute between Korea and China. Koguryo (Korean)/Gaogouli (Chinese), an ancient kingdom in the period between 37 BC and AD 668, encompassed a vast area from central Manchuria to south of Seoul. According to the "Northeast Project”, launched in China in 2002, Gaogouli was an ethnic regime in an ancient Chinese province. In contrast, Korean historians of nationalist persuasion view Koguryo as an ancestral state of the Korean historical tradition and a foundation of the national identity. Unity, continuity and coherence are claimed in both communities through invoking the history and culture of Koguryo/Gaogouli. Koguryo/Gaogouli relics which were put on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2004 are pivotal in the contestation between China and Korea. In both, the ancient relics are held to show the distinctiveness of a national past linked to the present. This article argues that the contested history of Koguryo/Gaogouli should be examined as a site of historical hybridity between China and Korea, rather than being claimed as a site of exclusive national history.
...For Koreans, the northern lands of Puyo (Korean)/Fuyu (Chinese), Koguryo and Parhae have been thought of as a spiritual motherland nourishing Korean culture (Byington 2004-c). Amongst the ancient kingdoms, Koguryo has always been treated as an ancestral state within the Korean historical tradition which both nurtures and unites people under one national identity, a feeling that has been particularly strong in North Korea. Thus, across the political spectrum in academia and NGOs, South Koreans have been unanimous in criticizing China’s claim to Koguryo’s historical heritage. This has been true in North Korea, as well. A shared Korean nationalism has facilitated North-South cooperation on the issue. Choe Kwang-sik (2004-b), a leading South Korean historian and protester in the Koguryo affair, points that the Chinese remapping of history could result in reducing the span of Korean history to less than 2,000 years, thereby losing 700 years of a proud chapter of its history, losing a historical pillar of Korean identity, delimiting the size of Korea's territory to an area south of the Han River. A trans-historical "we” with timeless qualities is constructed in nationalist narratives. Yoe Ho-kyu (2004), another South Korean historian, asserts that "it is absolutely clear that the Goguryeo people are ancestors of the Korean people because Korea inherited Goguryeo culture in its entirety.” Koguryo history is thus mobilised to buttress the continuity of the Korean nation-state since the foundation of the nation by Tan’gun, roughly five millennia ago, through to the modern nation-state. The historically recovered ancient past has been powerful in defining contemporary Korean national identity. Thus, the Koguryo issue has led to an escalation in the debate over sites of "ethnic origins” and national continuity in Korea. The concerns over "damaging the origin of the Korean nation fatally” so that Korea becomes "a rootless nation” have been expressed in the media. This maintains the trope that "Our roots define us.”
Protests against claims to the Chineseness of Koguryo have been intense. In December 2003, activist groups in South Korea and overseas launched a public awareness campaign. South Korean civic activists held a series of rallies in protest against the Northeast Project and the Chinese government. The issue has become a frequent topic on TV and radio. A group of seventeen historical societies across South Korea took joint action against their Chinese counterparts in December 2003. The Society for Korean Ancient History issued a statement condemning China’s actions. Rallies have been held outside the Chinese embassy in Seoul. Scores of websites dedicated to the study of Koguryo have sprung up. Korean "netizens” protest and lay emphasis on "Korean spirit” by posting, for example, statements such as this: "as a small country, we have suffered countless hardships and humiliation at the hands of stronger nations, but the spirit of Korea can never be extinguished.” "The Spirit of Koguryo is in the hearts of 80 million Koreans,” reads a wide banner hung in Seoul during a demonstration in January 2004. It was referring to the populations of both North and South, as well as to Koreans living abroad. The Chinese claims to Koguryo have resulted in promoting cooperation between North and South Koreans and the Korean diaspora. The nation is inscribed as one surrounded by others who "steal” "our history and territory”. Collective needs to preserve the community’s irreplaceable historical values have been strongly addressed in the face of China’s nationalist projects.
Indeed, the two Koreas have competed to establish hegemony and legitimacy as heirs of the Korean nation since the partition in the postwar era. Koguryo antiquities and history embody special political significance in this competition. They denote the legitimacy of political authority and rule in North Korea. Koguryo is eulogised as an embodiment of the true national spirit and depicted as a champion of Koreanness against treacherous pro-foreign Silla in the North Korean official version of history ( Petrov 2004). Some North Korean archaeologists deny that "the Han Chinese ever conquered any part of the Korean peninsula.” (Pearson 1978, in Nelson 1995: 229) North Korean historians underline the "self-reliance, uniqueness and superiority of Goguryeo culture”. (Chin Ho-t’ae 1990) Accordingly, Chinese claims on Koguryo have been strongly denounced as "a pathetic attempt to manipulate history for its own interests” or "intentionally distorting historical facts through biased perspectives” in North Korean media...
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
King Jumong
Koguryo-Related Books Published
Pyongyang, February 6 (KCNA) -- The Publishing House of Social Science of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has published "Issues Related to Koguryo History" and "Castles of Koguryo", books on Koguryo which existed as a powerful state in the East for nearly a thousand years. The book "Issues Related to Koguryo History" has a prologue, an epilogue and eight chapters including "Building of Koguryo, World of Kings", "Course of Territorial Annexation and Integration by Koguryo", "Feudal Social, Political and Military Systems of Koguryo and Its Major Political Events" and "External Relationship, Independent Foreign Policy of Koguryo".
Koguryo-Related Books Published
Pyongyang, February 6 (KCNA) -- The Publishing House of Social Science of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has published "Issues Related to Koguryo History" and "Castles of Koguryo", books on Koguryo which existed as a powerful state in the East for nearly a thousand years. The book "Issues Related to Koguryo History" has a prologue, an epilogue and eight chapters including "Building of Koguryo, World of Kings", "Course of Territorial Annexation and Integration by Koguryo", "Feudal Social, Political and Military Systems of Koguryo and Its Major Political Events" and "External Relationship, Independent Foreign Policy of Koguryo".
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
King Muhyol
It deals with the territory, national power, relationship between Koguryo and neighboring countries, social system and other major issues related to Koguryo that had been distorted, fabricated and dwarfed by internal and external feudal historians and reptile historians of the Japanese imperialists and that have been clarified and corrected by the historical academy of Korea since the liberation of the country. The book "Castles of Koguryo" contains a prologue, an appendix and six chapters including "Distribution of Castles of Koguryo", "Castle Defense System of Koguryo", "Characteristics of Koguryo Castles" and "Influence of Castle Architecture of Koguryo Exerted on Surrounding Countries".
It says the prosperity of Koguryo was firmly guaranteed by the high degree of patriotism of the Koguryo people who regarded the national defence as the most sacred duty and by the castles that were the products of their distinguished creative power. Meanwhile, the publishing house brought "Collection of Scientific Papers on Koguryo History" (two volumes).
It deals with the territory, national power, relationship between Koguryo and neighboring countries, social system and other major issues related to Koguryo that had been distorted, fabricated and dwarfed by internal and external feudal historians and reptile historians of the Japanese imperialists and that have been clarified and corrected by the historical academy of Korea since the liberation of the country. The book "Castles of Koguryo" contains a prologue, an appendix and six chapters including "Distribution of Castles of Koguryo", "Castle Defense System of Koguryo", "Characteristics of Koguryo Castles" and "Influence of Castle Architecture of Koguryo Exerted on Surrounding Countries".
It says the prosperity of Koguryo was firmly guaranteed by the high degree of patriotism of the Koguryo people who regarded the national defence as the most sacred duty and by the castles that were the products of their distinguished creative power. Meanwhile, the publishing house brought "Collection of Scientific Papers on Koguryo History" (two volumes).
florina-octaviana89- Colaborator special
- 0 Mesaje : 4248
Data de inscriere : 27/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
Re: Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (2)
va recomand continuarea serialului Jumong,se numeste Regatul Vanturilor.Este un serial careia nu-i lipseste nimic:sensibilitate,dramatism,destin si curaj,onoare....http://www.romaniarelease.net/2011/03/regatul-vanturilor.html
miss you- membru nou
- Mesaje : 9
Data de inscriere : 22/05/2011
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
GUMUS-NOOR- Alteta
- 0 Mesaje : 35933
Data de inscriere : 21/12/2009
Pagina 30 din 32 • 1 ... 16 ... 29, 30, 31, 32
Subiecte similare
» Legendele palatului: Printul Jumong (1)
» Legendele palatului: doctorul Hur Jun
» Legendele palatului: negustorul Lim Sang-ok
» Legendele palatului: doctorul Hur Jun
» Legendele palatului: negustorul Lim Sang-ok
Pagina 30 din 32
Permisiunile acestui forum:
Nu puteti raspunde la subiectele acestui forum
|
|
Joi Oct 05, 2017 11:58 am Scris de dong yi
» Asi - impotriva destinului
Mier Aug 06, 2014 2:41 pm Scris de GIULIA
» Dragoste si pedeapsa-Comentarii
Mar Mai 07, 2013 9:14 pm Scris de cristinuta
» O propunere inedita
Lun Apr 15, 2013 9:05 am Scris de studenta
» Iubire ascunsa
Lun Dec 17, 2012 9:04 am Scris de Nicky
» Karadayi / Kenan İmirzalıoğlu, Bergüzar Korel
Sam Noi 24, 2012 1:03 pm Scris de Nicky
» 소지섭 / So Ji Sub
Mar Oct 09, 2012 10:07 pm Scris de GUMUS-NOOR
» Han Ji Min 한지민 # 1
Dum Oct 07, 2012 2:23 pm Scris de GUMUS-NOOR
» ASI videoclipuri
Vin Oct 05, 2012 11:20 am Scris de utzy